In a story on Don Bolduc, a U.S. Senate candidate for New Hampshire, the Reuters news agency alleged that Bolduc had retracted
"his previously false claims that Joe Biden had won unfairly."
The Reuters report implies that the news agency can prove that there was no massive cheating in the 2020 presidential election that put Biden over the top. Yet Reuters offers no extensive investigative reporting to substantiate its claim.
Reuters joins other news media in baselessly claiming that proof exists that no substantial fraud or unfair practices occurred. The report would have been objective had it referred to "his previous claims that Joe Biden had won unfairly."
Any copy editor worth his or her salt knows very well how to guard against bias.
The only reason possible for the constant repetition of this unprofessional assertion is a diktat from higher-ups in media organizations who represent the media cartel. That cartel wants to control speech and election outcomes and cooperates with the social media cartel in repressing news sources that do not toe the cartel line.
The wild use of the terms "false" and "baseless" is a tactic of politicians, not of professional news people. This repetitive form of attack is known from history when many leftist and "liberal" news persons continually portrayed Sen. Joe McCarthy as making supposedly "baseless charges" of communist influence in government and media.
These days, the media cartel -- which is interlocked with the big investment fund cartel -- aims to suppress any political dissent which threatens business with China, nevermind the powerful Chinese communist party's influence within U.S. media, business and government.
Though political pressure has forced Biden to flog China with a wet noodle, the Chinese communist leadership greatly prefers him to Donald Trump, who instituted trade restrictions in response to unfair trade practices by China.
The Reuters report implies that the news agency can prove that there was no massive cheating in the 2020 presidential election that put Biden over the top. Yet Reuters offers no extensive investigative reporting to substantiate its claim.
Reuters joins other news media in baselessly claiming that proof exists that no substantial fraud or unfair practices occurred. The report would have been objective had it referred to "his previous claims that Joe Biden had won unfairly."
Any copy editor worth his or her salt knows very well how to guard against bias.
The only reason possible for the constant repetition of this unprofessional assertion is a diktat from higher-ups in media organizations who represent the media cartel. That cartel wants to control speech and election outcomes and cooperates with the social media cartel in repressing news sources that do not toe the cartel line.
The wild use of the terms "false" and "baseless" is a tactic of politicians, not of professional news people. This repetitive form of attack is known from history when many leftist and "liberal" news persons continually portrayed Sen. Joe McCarthy as making supposedly "baseless charges" of communist influence in government and media.
These days, the media cartel -- which is interlocked with the big investment fund cartel -- aims to suppress any political dissent which threatens business with China, nevermind the powerful Chinese communist party's influence within U.S. media, business and government.
Though political pressure has forced Biden to flog China with a wet noodle, the Chinese communist leadership greatly prefers him to Donald Trump, who instituted trade restrictions in response to unfair trade practices by China.
No comments:
Post a Comment